Today man is almost entirely a man of serfdom, and therefore belongs to the state. Gives you ninety percent of their income in the form of compulsory taxes, benefits and other tributes ....
population dependent
Today's man is almost entirely a man of serfdom, and therefore belongs to the state. Gives you ninety percent of their income in the form of compulsory taxes, benefits and other tributes. Charge him or network connections. Forced retirement, compulsory health care system and in practice, compulsory schooling, because even home teaching is largely regulated by state institutions. And as it was in the past, whether they were ever light and freedom, or just the darkness and the darkness of slavery?
Personal freedom and money and its circulation
- the influence of money and monetary circulation on individual liberty
Since ancient times, if not from the beginning, some people wanted to subjugate others, and some would be subordinated to another, to avoid the problem of choice, and extricate himself from his own ignorance, apathy and helplessness in which they were due to various reasons, immersed. Stronger, of course, they wanted to subjugate the weaker and poorer, and that is also less educated and more deprived of property, and above devoid of all air defense systems and mechanisms for social protection-are fundamental to the survival of their security. So, the claw of dynamism and aggression, today called assertiveness.
wyodrębniał Since the Middle Ages to the type of dependent peoples, people dependent.
"dependent population" deprived of property settled on the lands of the landowner, and fell into different forms depending-subordination. Was sometimes vice versa, is associated with a new type of state, gallofrankijską civilization, making the expansion into new lands and new markets, wealthy, sought deprivation of property and liberty of people living in the territory. No wonder that a free people rebelled and triggered the uprising, and our ancestors 'Lekhs ", or if you like' Lech" summon fire for us against this anti-libertarian and statist, and therefore anti-human and barbaric civilization. The trail led from fire and Elbe Zaodrza, through the lands of sandstones, Obodrzyców and Veleti, and after the death of Boleslaw the Brave, the great rebellion, perhaps wrongly associated with the rebellion against the Christian religion, he took right the whole kingdom, except for the Mazowsze region, where supporters fled to the new order. Despite the fact that it was suppressed, the oligarchs became a bit cautious in bringing Western government. A second rebellion, and expressed the opposition of Bishop Stanislaw, completely gave the ruling already thinking that civilization is a Polish libertarian, and libertarian nature still remained at least 400 years until King Sigismund the Old, and the 16th century.
But let us return to our beginning of the text, the population dependent fell into different forms depending-subordination, for example, had no right to grind corn in the other mills, than in those who belonged to the landowner. Then, depending on the kind of deepened in August usually. Dependent people have to buy in the stores, "belonging to the owner of the workplace, and in its extreme form a kind of" chips "dominalne can exchange only for a beer and then later the owner karczmy.Ciekawe vodka that emerged are two types of relationships, more human, in the west, where prevailed "tribute" - are charged rent, and in the east where they are normally paid a wage job, or her own body. Our tradition, like the Czech was in his beginning to the first, looking at wybijanego abundance of money, several competing currencies, "and is true, because the ore. Paradoxically
libertarian, at least compared to more western Polish culture, and became 16wieku mainly due to serfdom, more barbaric and backward, from the western system. This process probably occurred under the influence of cultural expansion of the east, and import the eastern oligarchs to the Polish State Conversely, the eastern countries of the Commonwealth, under the influence of our culture become more libertarian. And the process of enslaving individuals in Europe, included a with its two edges, in the south, where under the influence of Islam touched the most Spaniards, and southern Italy, and east. Should also mention the Balkans, and the expansion of civilization and models of cultural practice. In each case, however, were the foreign influences. Anyway
civilization itself "Western was not homogeneous, in addition to mainstream Christian and Greek [libertarian] was also a trend of" Roman "- wyrodzony under the influence of Persia and statist welfare state, it also drew gallofrankijska thought, and indigenous local traditions
This type of division of labor, and the breakdown by type of service, known since antiquity. Breakdown of the people more or less free, with rights and property, and slaves * almost entirely dependent on the owner's place of employment, or means of livelihood.
Possible causes of this phenomenon could be the low penetration of money as a means of exchange, and a small number of coins in circulation.
course causes subordination and enslavement could be many, and they can also coexist side by side: external or internal violence, restrictive laws, a low level of knowledge and low activity of the individual, family or community, that is, de facto, underdevelopment, low levels of knowledge concerning the mechanisms of exchange and prudent management of resources, the maintenance of this knowledge, for example, the money and the market in secret by those in power for life and exploitation of the community over which it ruled.
So where there was no money or did not develop to a sufficient degree of this type of exchange-dominated slave relationship.
interesting phenomenon is that communism too, the same coming from the west europe, was such a great medium in the east.
-Socialism or jump on the money
It was the kind of system where the property belonged to one owner, a small group of ownership,-oligarchs, probably today we would say to the "shareholders" of the company-a company called-state-, it was a state monopoly, you really managed by a small group of oligarchs who are in power, and an example of extreme zniewolenia.Ten same owner had a monopoly on the creation-creation of laws and their interpretation, he had a monopoly the beat of money, and having other currencies was often forbidden. Also the possibility to move freely and change of residence, and leave your place of work ab-control restrictions-restrictions. Also, we can say that the system is dependent people has been developed to a maximum of communism and socialism, it is.
to one owner-owned monopoly, factories, workplaces, shops, and trade.
TRANSFORMATION
In any event, the last 18 years have passed and a form of "money", but times have changed, and was completely new quality. You have passed in the form of state capitalism can freely control the property, and citizens through fees and levies,-taxes, licenses and permits system developed for various social benefits, [rents, tributes, attributes will], and the degree of state interference in the freedom and property of citizens shall not set any rules, enough of this government or parliament can at any time and without the Bolshevik Revolution to confiscate the property of the citizens with even the above-mentioned taxes, raising its height to height close to one hundred percent of revenue. And in this way to introduce communism in a democratic or Marxist
From what we see the greatest threat to the citizen, the man is a parliament that could create any law and strike at his liberty, and property ..
thing is all the more ridiculous that the modern citizen-taxpayer pays tribute Danegeld euphemistically called today for the right to a tax of their own jobs, land, houses, do not like it used to pay usually for lease, rent. Now they are at home and pay for that right, tribute - state administration.
Not only that there are also new forms of control people after free as chips, nanotechnology, etc. ..
Advance
capitalism and slavery fiscal
early laissez-faire capitalism was a moment of breath, after reaching ossificans and statism in Europe, has generated a wave of rebellion stemming mainly from religious groups *, both Catholic and freedoms of individuals and protestanckich.Wzrost freedom to travel and movement have made it easier for people to alter their lives and affect nie.Przenosili August so the place where they can live better lives, the larger cities and even backward ocean.Stare passive structures in the statist societies encourage immigration, the same could not and not wanting to generate self-change, while effectively blocking the possibility of coming to power of a talented and intelligent, relegating them to the margins of life and vegetation, or force them to emigrate in search of better living conditions - such situations we observe, for example, now in Poland.
left so an old lag structure and traveled to more places available, where new technologies create space pracy.Czy we can compare an individual, libertarian capitalism 19wieczny with today's soc-capitalism full restrictions and tax extortion rogue for a new ruling class, state administration officials and her acting jointly and in consultation group of owners.
The good old, free of capitalism, an employed person can maintain his entire family, working husband claimed his wife, several children and sometimes elderly parents. Today, the extreme social Poland, two young people working in a big city, a husband and wife, because the children did not even think they can barely make a living, pay for a rental apartment, endless taxes, and fees ....
WHY IS PRIVATE PROPERTY BETTER
what kind it is evident from the seemingly
The first and most direct response to what we are arises is this: because it is associated with a person, and it's relationship with the person and make the direct link to any form of alienation , isolation and even alienation of property can not be said. And the owner, by thinking and acting through its own body of this renewal of your mind comes with it is a direct link. But if we wanted to further develop the issues are: first, the person managing the property is responsible for its contents, easy. Secondly, is interested in [this union] because he sees and feels the profits arising from such relationship, or their shortcomings.
third is free, and depending on what type it can only impose a type of political dependence. Fourth, no more freedom of choice, gains from economic activity may change, bring, in the form of money, valuables, and then build them in the land, housing, education, the creation of a workplace. After Fifth, it is a moral and rational, which is not without significance.
Cons cons that may arise in connection with private property.
first and greatest threat that may occur in conjunction with private property, is the monopolization of a particular territory or any area of \u200b\u200blife, but this applies to any kind of monopoly, and state and state-private szemranego ", which can force the population of the data territory for the use of the monopoly, the state-dependent people .. It is of little importance whether it is to create a monopoly in the field of monetary policy-then it's a monopoly, the central bank, or some other monopoly on the currency market, a monopoly that controls the media and information flows, banks, land ,....
great helper monopolies are bad laws creator, perhaps acting in collusion with the monopolists themselves or for their benefit, [or on behalf of their origin], and I am thinking of politicians, and members, and sometimes also local government employees, then they operate to the detriment of the people paying their activities, thus working against the interests of the employer.
So we see that any monopoly is dangerous, the owner of a monopoly, whether individual or state, and standing behind a group of oligarchs, effectively managing the property, it does not matter how well it will be socialism, and what kind of window-dressing is applied, an orthodox Marxist, socialist-national, nation-state, popular, religious [Catholic], etc.
Each of the above-mentioned types of monopoly is a threat to individual liberty, and the relationships that happen between people and society as a whole, society as a whole. Therefore
widespread, dispersed ownership, is the best, even if it is not always best for the economy.
Today's man is almost entirely a man of serfdom, and therefore belongs to the state. Gives you ninety percent of their income in the form of compulsory taxes, benefits and other tributes. Charge him or network connections. Forced retirement, compulsory health care system and in practice, compulsory schooling, because even home teaching is largely regulated by state institutions. And as it was in the past, whether they were ever light and freedom, or just the darkness and the darkness of slavery?
Personal freedom and money and its circulation
- the influence of money and monetary circulation on individual liberty
Since ancient times, if not from the beginning, some people wanted to subjugate others, and some would be subordinated to another, to avoid the problem of choice, and extricate himself from his own ignorance, apathy and helplessness in which they were due to various reasons, immersed. Stronger, of course, they wanted to subjugate the weaker and poorer, and that is also less educated and more deprived of property, and above devoid of all air defense systems and mechanisms for social protection-are fundamental to the survival of their security. So, the claw of dynamism and aggression, today called assertiveness.
wyodrębniał Since the Middle Ages to the type of dependent peoples, people dependent.
"dependent population" deprived of property settled on the lands of the landowner, and fell into different forms depending-subordination. Was sometimes vice versa, is associated with a new type of state, gallofrankijską civilization, making the expansion into new lands and new markets, wealthy, sought deprivation of property and liberty of people living in the territory. No wonder that a free people rebelled and triggered the uprising, and our ancestors 'Lekhs ", or if you like' Lech" summon fire for us against this anti-libertarian and statist, and therefore anti-human and barbaric civilization. The trail led from fire and Elbe Zaodrza, through the lands of sandstones, Obodrzyców and Veleti, and after the death of Boleslaw the Brave, the great rebellion, perhaps wrongly associated with the rebellion against the Christian religion, he took right the whole kingdom, except for the Mazowsze region, where supporters fled to the new order. Despite the fact that it was suppressed, the oligarchs became a bit cautious in bringing Western government. A second rebellion, and expressed the opposition of Bishop Stanislaw, completely gave the ruling already thinking that civilization is a Polish libertarian, and libertarian nature still remained at least 400 years until King Sigismund the Old, and the 16th century.
But let us return to our beginning of the text, the population dependent fell into different forms depending-subordination, for example, had no right to grind corn in the other mills, than in those who belonged to the landowner. Then, depending on the kind of deepened in August usually. Dependent people have to buy in the stores, "belonging to the owner of the workplace, and in its extreme form a kind of" chips "dominalne can exchange only for a beer and then later the owner karczmy.Ciekawe vodka that emerged are two types of relationships, more human, in the west, where prevailed "tribute" - are charged rent, and in the east where they are normally paid a wage job, or her own body. Our tradition, like the Czech was in his beginning to the first, looking at wybijanego abundance of money, several competing currencies, "and is true, because the ore. Paradoxically
libertarian, at least compared to more western Polish culture, and became 16wieku mainly due to serfdom, more barbaric and backward, from the western system. This process probably occurred under the influence of cultural expansion of the east, and import the eastern oligarchs to the Polish State Conversely, the eastern countries of the Commonwealth, under the influence of our culture become more libertarian. And the process of enslaving individuals in Europe, included a with its two edges, in the south, where under the influence of Islam touched the most Spaniards, and southern Italy, and east. Should also mention the Balkans, and the expansion of civilization and models of cultural practice. In each case, however, were the foreign influences. Anyway
civilization itself "Western was not homogeneous, in addition to mainstream Christian and Greek [libertarian] was also a trend of" Roman "- wyrodzony under the influence of Persia and statist welfare state, it also drew gallofrankijska thought, and indigenous local traditions
This type of division of labor, and the breakdown by type of service, known since antiquity. Breakdown of the people more or less free, with rights and property, and slaves * almost entirely dependent on the owner's place of employment, or means of livelihood.
Possible causes of this phenomenon could be the low penetration of money as a means of exchange, and a small number of coins in circulation.
course causes subordination and enslavement could be many, and they can also coexist side by side: external or internal violence, restrictive laws, a low level of knowledge and low activity of the individual, family or community, that is, de facto, underdevelopment, low levels of knowledge concerning the mechanisms of exchange and prudent management of resources, the maintenance of this knowledge, for example, the money and the market in secret by those in power for life and exploitation of the community over which it ruled.
So where there was no money or did not develop to a sufficient degree of this type of exchange-dominated slave relationship.
interesting phenomenon is that communism too, the same coming from the west europe, was such a great medium in the east.
-Socialism or jump on the money
It was the kind of system where the property belonged to one owner, a small group of ownership,-oligarchs, probably today we would say to the "shareholders" of the company-a company called-state-, it was a state monopoly, you really managed by a small group of oligarchs who are in power, and an example of extreme zniewolenia.Ten same owner had a monopoly on the creation-creation of laws and their interpretation, he had a monopoly the beat of money, and having other currencies was often forbidden. Also the possibility to move freely and change of residence, and leave your place of work ab-control restrictions-restrictions. Also, we can say that the system is dependent people has been developed to a maximum of communism and socialism, it is.
to one owner-owned monopoly, factories, workplaces, shops, and trade.
TRANSFORMATION
In any event, the last 18 years have passed and a form of "money", but times have changed, and was completely new quality. You have passed in the form of state capitalism can freely control the property, and citizens through fees and levies,-taxes, licenses and permits system developed for various social benefits, [rents, tributes, attributes will], and the degree of state interference in the freedom and property of citizens shall not set any rules, enough of this government or parliament can at any time and without the Bolshevik Revolution to confiscate the property of the citizens with even the above-mentioned taxes, raising its height to height close to one hundred percent of revenue. And in this way to introduce communism in a democratic or Marxist
From what we see the greatest threat to the citizen, the man is a parliament that could create any law and strike at his liberty, and property ..
thing is all the more ridiculous that the modern citizen-taxpayer pays tribute Danegeld euphemistically called today for the right to a tax of their own jobs, land, houses, do not like it used to pay usually for lease, rent. Now they are at home and pay for that right, tribute - state administration.
Not only that there are also new forms of control people after free as chips, nanotechnology, etc. ..
Advance
capitalism and slavery fiscal
early laissez-faire capitalism was a moment of breath, after reaching ossificans and statism in Europe, has generated a wave of rebellion stemming mainly from religious groups *, both Catholic and freedoms of individuals and protestanckich.Wzrost freedom to travel and movement have made it easier for people to alter their lives and affect nie.Przenosili August so the place where they can live better lives, the larger cities and even backward ocean.Stare passive structures in the statist societies encourage immigration, the same could not and not wanting to generate self-change, while effectively blocking the possibility of coming to power of a talented and intelligent, relegating them to the margins of life and vegetation, or force them to emigrate in search of better living conditions - such situations we observe, for example, now in Poland.
left so an old lag structure and traveled to more places available, where new technologies create space pracy.Czy we can compare an individual, libertarian capitalism 19wieczny with today's soc-capitalism full restrictions and tax extortion rogue for a new ruling class, state administration officials and her acting jointly and in consultation group of owners.
The good old, free of capitalism, an employed person can maintain his entire family, working husband claimed his wife, several children and sometimes elderly parents. Today, the extreme social Poland, two young people working in a big city, a husband and wife, because the children did not even think they can barely make a living, pay for a rental apartment, endless taxes, and fees ....
WHY IS PRIVATE PROPERTY BETTER
what kind it is evident from the seemingly
The first and most direct response to what we are arises is this: because it is associated with a person, and it's relationship with the person and make the direct link to any form of alienation , isolation and even alienation of property can not be said. And the owner, by thinking and acting through its own body of this renewal of your mind comes with it is a direct link. But if we wanted to further develop the issues are: first, the person managing the property is responsible for its contents, easy. Secondly, is interested in [this union] because he sees and feels the profits arising from such relationship, or their shortcomings.
third is free, and depending on what type it can only impose a type of political dependence. Fourth, no more freedom of choice, gains from economic activity may change, bring, in the form of money, valuables, and then build them in the land, housing, education, the creation of a workplace. After Fifth, it is a moral and rational, which is not without significance.
Cons cons that may arise in connection with private property.
first and greatest threat that may occur in conjunction with private property, is the monopolization of a particular territory or any area of \u200b\u200blife, but this applies to any kind of monopoly, and state and state-private szemranego ", which can force the population of the data territory for the use of the monopoly, the state-dependent people .. It is of little importance whether it is to create a monopoly in the field of monetary policy-then it's a monopoly, the central bank, or some other monopoly on the currency market, a monopoly that controls the media and information flows, banks, land ,....
great helper monopolies are bad laws creator, perhaps acting in collusion with the monopolists themselves or for their benefit, [or on behalf of their origin], and I am thinking of politicians, and members, and sometimes also local government employees, then they operate to the detriment of the people paying their activities, thus working against the interests of the employer.
So we see that any monopoly is dangerous, the owner of a monopoly, whether individual or state, and standing behind a group of oligarchs, effectively managing the property, it does not matter how well it will be socialism, and what kind of window-dressing is applied, an orthodox Marxist, socialist-national, nation-state, popular, religious [Catholic], etc.
Each of the above-mentioned types of monopoly is a threat to individual liberty, and the relationships that happen between people and society as a whole, society as a whole. Therefore
widespread, dispersed ownership, is the best, even if it is not always best for the economy.
by Professor Maurice Wilk
article was already published include "Ithinku" and "Liberator"
-by the way we would like to thank the prf. because much of passwords
is his own, and despite the fact that there are currently on an expedition in South America
existence of this blog would be impossible without it
0 comments:
Post a Comment